Kieran’s Our City, Our Town Article,

Cork Independent, 18 October 2012

“Technical Memories (Part 31) –Men of Action”

“At the library of the School of Art, last evening, a very interesting presentation took place when the Committee, the staffs of the Cork Technical Schools, and the pupils united in paying tribute to Mr. A.F. Sharman Crawford on his retirement from active participation in the affairs of the committee, of which he had been chairman for a period of 16 years” (Cork Examiner, 19 February, 1926).

As spring unrolled itself in 1926, change was also upon the Crawford Technical Institute as its founder, Arthur Frederick Sharman Crawford, stepped down from the institute’s management committee after 16 years. He was presented with an illuminated address on Roman vellum bound in a hand worked leather cover in a copper casket, jewelled with enamels and decorated with Celtic ornament. The address, which was in Irish and English, and consisted of four pages of illumination, was the work of Mr. John Power, second master of the Cork School of Art. The casquet, which was executed by James Archer, was from a design by Miss Gladys Scott. The Cork arms appeared in painted enamels. The leather cover, by Miss Scott, contained the Crawford arms and motto. Lord Mayor of Cork, James French did the presentation honours and a large number of guests were present, which included the Principal of the Crawford Technical Institute, J.F. King. Mr Crawford in reply, said he was very glad to have a record in years to come; noting that it would be most interesting for future generations. He added that during his 16 years’ association with technical education, speaking was not his forte but he hoped, he had been a man of action more than speech.

Crawford left a strong management committee in charge.  In the Cork Examiner on 17 November 1926, a summary was published of the Department Inspector’s report on the working of the scheme of technical instruction in operation in Cork City during the 1925-26 session. The educational programme was similar to that of preceding years and steady progress was made in the majority of the courses of study. The teaching of physics and chemistry had been maintained for many years at a high level of efficiency; instruction in many branches of mechanical, motor car, and electrical engineering had shown gradual improvement and had reached a “very satisfactory standard”. In view of the growing importance of motor car and electrical engineering, it was hoped that there would still a still further increase in the enrolment in the next session. In workshop practice it was suggested that instruction be given in the general use of machines, such as cutting speeds for different materials, etc. In carpentry and joinery, it was proposed that hand sketches should receive more careful attention so as to give a fair representation of the proportion of parts. In cabinet-making it was advised that apprentices should undergo a good course of manual instruction in wood before attempting cabinet work. In building construction the arrangement of holding all classes simultaneously in one room was unsatisfactory, and was pointed out as needed remedying. The course in domestic economy also showed improvement both in teaching and in the standard of efficiency of the students. A difficulty in the needlework classes for the unemployed was the inability of many of the students to purchase materials, and such students were engaged mainly in mending garments. The shirt-making classes failed to attract students in the trade and needed a review.  

In the same month, on the 10 November 1926, key members involved in technical education in Cork appeared before the Technical Commission of the Irish Free State. Its background dated to 1924 when Technical Instruction was assigned by the Ministers and Secretaries Act to the Minister for Education and shortly afterwards a Commission on Vocational Education was set up. The report of this Commission was the basis of the Vocational Education Act of 1930. The technical commission held 75 nationwide meetings and 129 witnesses were interviewed.

The report by the Cork group presented evidence under the headings of finance, buildings, day technical schools, co-ordination, adult education, art instruction and music. The group comprised W. Ellis, Vice Chairman of Cork County Borough Technical Committee, J.F. King, Principal of the Crawford Institute and D.J. Coakley, Principal of the Municipal School of Commerce. On finance, they noted that the then basis of distribution of the endowment grant was unsatisfactory. Although the population of Cork had increased since the Technical Instruction Act of 1899 came into force, the grant  income was less in 1926 than it was originally due to the fact that the percentage of increase in other boroughs was higher. A fairer basis for distribution was proposed based on the ratio of the population availing of the advantages of technical instruction. They also proposed that the striking of the local rate for Technical Instruction be no longer “permissive” but mandatory and that the limit of 2d. in the pound be abolished as was the case in Northern Ireland. In addition the attendance grants for numbers attending was unsatisfactory and needed changing. All in all in terms of finance, the grant system of funding needed to be reviewed.

To be continued…

Caption:

663a. Advertisement for The Munster Arcade, Cork, March 1926 (source: Cork City Library) 

Kieran’s Our City, Our Town Article,

Cork Independent, 11 October 2012

“Technical Memories (Part 30) –The Fallacies of Education”

“People must once and for all get rid of the fallacy that Ireland is a land of scholars, and also of the idea that scholarship is nothing more that knowing the grammar of one or two languages and the ability to recite a certain number of lines of poetry, or to pass certain examinations. Nor would anything be lost if the too prevalent idea were killed that the sole purpose of education is to qualify for civil service or public jobs. Of course if education generally were directed on more practical lines such an idea could not survive, and students, when they left school, would be more inclined to continue the study of useful branches in their spare time” (Editorial, Cork Examiner, 1 October 1924).

In an editorial in the Cork Examiner on 1 October 1924 on the value of Adult Education, it opened with commenting on the continuing growing interest in adult education in the United States. Indeed America’s National Education Association (NEA) was created in 1870 and had a strong history of the promotion of lifelong learning. The editor of the Cork Examiner argued that in the cities and larger towns of the Irish Free State, it was a regrettable fact that “comparatively little interest was taken, either by the educational authorities or the people in general, in a movement which, outside of Ireland had made great advancement”.  The active interest in education that was there 25 years previously did not exist. The editor further noted; “Anybody has only to pass through the principal street of the city between eight and ten o’clock to see hundreds of young people strolling about who would be much more usefully employed learning the elements of house-keeping, dress-making, gardening, or perhaps, some more literary branches. And besides those who have only left school, there are hundreds-even thousands-whose spare time could be put to better purpose… a large amount of money is expended on education in this country, a portion of which, in the opinion of many, might be more usefully employed in the provision of continuation classes or schools”.

The editorial goes on to describe that some years previously a certain amount of money was expended on nights classes in country towns and rural villages. The curricula under the County schemes were not very extensive, yet some degree of progress was attained, which promised better things as time went on. According to the editor, “the disturbed state of the country killed these classes for a time”, but there was now an opportunity for revival on a large scale.

Certainly at the Crawford Municipal Technical Institute, the management committee meetings during 1924 reveal a financial deficit and fall off in numbers attending classes. These problems were common-place across the technical institutes in the country as the Irish Free State tried to move away from civil war and build an economic structure for the country.  It is revealed through a response by the Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction in early July 1924 that the committee did apply for extra funding for its county and city based programmes. Subsequently, the work of the Cork institute was inspected. The Cork committee was successful in attaining a contribution by the Department towards the County schemes of £2,277 16s 1d. The Department regretted that they were unable to sanction any increases in salary other than those in accordance with approved scales and were unable to consider further increases until the funds of the committee were capable of meeting the expenditure involved by such increases. They hoped that through “exercising rigid economy in its administration” and by improved attendances at the classes that the Cork committee may be able to surmount the difficulties. The Department also pointed out that at least twenty hours’ teaching per week was, as a general rule, required of all whole-time teachers, while classes at which the attendance on four successive lessons had fallen below six, had to, unless in special circumstances, be withdrawn from the curriculum.

By October 1924, there were some efforts to increase class attendances and the Cork Committee sat down with several members of the Cork Workers’ Council. The Council was based at the Mechanics’ Hall, Grattan Street and later at Father Mathew Quay. There was a good response from the various unions in the direction of asking as many apprentices as possible to attend technical education classes. Hence the typographical class was able to raise its numbers to 20- a proportion that had never been reached before. However, the full equipment in the class, machinery etc was missing. A number of articles had been robbed from the school a few years previously. It was noted at the committee meeting that it would cost £309 10s 0d to replace the articles removed. There was also a proposal to utilise the services of the Domestic economy staff for short courses during the month of June. The Inspector’s report also noted that the rooms were defective to hold classes and that ventilation was poor in several domestic economy rooms. However, any changes would have had to coincide with structural alterations to the building.

To be continued…

Caption:

662a. Advertisement for Cashes & Co. Cork, October 1924 (source: Cork City Library)