Daily Archives: February 28, 2011

Kieran’s Comments on George Boole House, No.5 Grenville Place, Cork City Council Meeting, 28 February 2011

I would like to welcome the Council’s interventions here and acknowledge the hard work of Pat Ruane and Jeremy Ward.

The building at no. 5 Grenville Place has been vacant for a period of at least ten years and suffered from neglect and then collapsed.

The same thing happened it seemed last week on Kyle Street and before that Castle Street.

Lord Mayor, I’m worried about the strength of our Building Control unit. Over the last year, three buildings have now collapsed within a short space of each other. I worried about health and safety with such structures collapsing. And that’s not scare-mongering that’s being realistic plus I’d like to call for a swot analysis from that unit on what is going on.

I suppose on the heritage and history front; on one level, old nineteenth century buildings are all over the place in Cork and the vast majority are protected structures. But I still worry in how we don’t market and harness some of the key buildings of Cork’s built heritage – on a bigger scale, I could talk on about places such as the old Butter Exchange, which I have not seen a decent plan yet to really make it a centre piece of tourism in the Shandon area and in the city; I also worry and could also talk about Elizabeth Fort and its surrounding heritage and the challenges facing that 400 year old fort.

But here is a house where George Boole and eminent Mathematician lived.

Born in Lincoln, Boole went on to be an English mathematician and philosopher.

As the inventor of Boolean logic—the basis of modern digital computer logic—Boole is regarded in hindsight as a founder of the field of computer science.

 

George Boole Portrait

Way back in 1849, he came to Cork to be  the first professor of mathematics of then Queen’s College, Cork in Ireland (now University College Cork, (where the library, underground lecture theatre complex and the Boole Centre for Research in Informatics  are named in his honour).

 Living on Grenville Place, his mathematical skills were fully realized.

Boole approached logic in a new way reducing it to a simple algebra, incorporating logic into mathematics. He also worked on differential equations, the calculus of finite differences and general methods in probability

.

The 8 year stretch from 1847 to 1854 possibility when he was living at Grenville Place starts and ends with Boole’s two books on mathematical logic. In addition Boole published 24 more papers on traditional mathematics during this period, while only one paper was written on logic,. He was awarded an honorary degree by the University of Dublin in 1851, and this was the title that he used beside his name in his 1854 book on logic- Mathematical Analysis of Logic and his 1854 book, Laws of Thought..

During the last 10 years of his career, from 1855 to 1864, Boole published 17 papers on mathematics and two mathematics books, one on differential equations and one on difference equations. Both books were considered state of the art and used for instruction at Cambridge. Also during this time significant honors came in:

1857 

Fellowship of the Royal Society

1858 

Honorary Member of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

1859 

Honorary Degree of DCL, honoris causa from Oxford

Unfortunately his keen sense of duty led to his walking through a rainstorm in late 1864, and then lecturing in wet clothes. Not long afterwards, on December 8, 1864 in Ballintemple, County Cork, Ireland, he died of pneumonia, at the age of 49. Another paper on mathematics and a revised book on differential equations, giving considerable attention to singular solutions, were published post mortem.

In time Boole’s work formed the basis of mechanisms and processes in the real world and that it is therefore highly relevant. The use of Booles Boolean algebra could optimize the design of systems of electromechanical relays,his basic ideas underly all modern electronic digital computers.

The crater Boole on the Moon is named in his honour.

So in terms of the history of Boole’s House, we are dealing with something richly steeped in research and pushing forward the discipline of maths.

The Grenville Site is another example of how this city is not good at engaging and harnessing its history, its built heritage and minding it.

To conclude

I would like to observe that this city needs to (a) review the effectiveness of our Building Control Unit and (b) invest more in the harnessing of the city’s history, otherwise, the memory of such people as George Boole will disappear from this city with others – we’ll have a city with no uniquenesses and we’ll have a generic looking city that looks like any other city in the world.

thanks

George Boole house

George Boole House, Grenville Place

 George Boole, reply from City Manager, 28 February 2011

Kieran’s Comments on Draft North Blackpool Local Area Plan, 28 February 2011

North Blackpool Draft Local Area Plan

 

Lord Mayor,

At the outset, I’d like to thank the planning unit for their work on this document.

I would also like to compliment the North Central ward councillors for their active pursuit to get two local area plans for their central core area. And I look forward to the first draft of the Mahon Local Area Plan.

Lord Mayor, I stand here now after three local area plans have gone through this council’s hands in the last 18 months.  They have all varied in their design and I would argue in their approaches as well. The document before us has a very different style than the south Blackpool local area plan- from perspectives on the urban landscape to even the maps that were produced. I don’t think we’re getting a standard delivery of quality with regard to our local area plans.

I’m a big fan of the North Blackpool area especially from a historical perspective. From the train, I love the sweeping view of the City from Kilbarry and admiring how the houses were engineered into the steep hill of Farranree or Spangle Hill itself.

I remember in 2003 going out to Sunbeam and witnessing the building burning down and speaking with older people in the area as they looked on and how strong their respect for that place was. I remember afterwards going away and doing some research on the place.

Sunbeam, 19th century building

The main building, a five storey brick building, which was the first to be demolished after the fire was constructed between 1864 and 1866 and was the brainchild of William Shaw. Designed by Belfast architects, Boyd and Platt, it was the first industrial linen yarn-spinning mill outside of Ulster.

The Millfield Mill was operated by the Cork Spinning and Weaving Company whose directors chose the site outside the city’s municipal boundary. This was due to the fact, the company would not have to pay rates to Cork Corporation.

By the beginning of the twentieth century, the mill was one of the most important flax spinning mills outside of Ulster. As a symbol of local enterprise, the mill was also operating looms for weaving and by 1920 was employing upwards on 1,000 people.

The year 1924 marked the closure of the Cork Butter market adjacent Shandon and the opening of a knitwear factory on the site by William Dwyer. In 1928, William Dwyer transferred his factory from Shandon to the Millfield textile factory Blackpool in order to expand his business.

In the 1930s, Dwyer transferred his factory from Shandon to the Millfield textile factory Blackpool in order to expand his business. Three decades later, the Dwyer factory in the 1960s, the factory was witnessing much success and employed 1,100 people. It also attracted other smaller firms to the complex and was one of the city’s largest employers. The “House of Dwyer” also operated the Lee Hosiery Factory, Lee Shirt Factory and Lee Clothing Factory.

In the mid 1970s,the Millfield Factory was sold to UK firm, Courtaulds. Subsequently, in the 1980s, the factory employed over 3.500 people and in the early 1990s was taken over by Sunbeam Industries Limited, based in Westport. In 1995, Sunbeam Knitwear closed and the site became home to many local enterprises.

Talking to the people who watched the complex burn down, the Sunbeam complex had not only been a part of the twenty first century city but stood as a symbol of the city’s economic and social development, which many, many Corkonians are proud to be associated with. It was sadly missed and memories of it are still evoked. And I have no doubt if I said the word Sunbeam and asked some of the older members here to discuss; you’d talk on…  a place where friendships were formed, romances kindled and the long hours of hard work.

But thinking of all that nostalgic energy and then looking at the plan – there is a disconnection in how planners think about placemaking; Indeed there is no mention of Sunbeam or really any other iconic historic sites in the area.

In fact we now more or less have two plans for Blackpool, a place dripping in stories, memories, nostalgia and no plan to use any of it in creating or injecting the future of Blackpool with an identity.

In fact, l would like to observe especially in this plan that this plan is lacking imagination in how we can really inspire and create public spaces of meaning; When I was thinking of Sunbeam I was thinking, wouldn’t it be great to have a sunbeam square where once more friendships and dates could start from.

The two plans of Blackpool back to back, I feel are indirectly creating identityless places, a sense of placelessness, souless places, which you can see anywhere in the world

 Indeed with the two plans back to back there is no strategy to harness the energy of the area’s history and memories that make up the sense of place in Blackpool and why people living in that area and from that area are so, so proud of their roots and their identity.

Where this plan does go some way in making the connection better between spaces within the area together, this draft plan I feel lacks a certain quality that plugs into this areas uniqueness – the draft plan does lack depth and imagination in how public space and heritage could go hand in hand.

Sunbeam worker, mid 20th century from Cork Archives Collection

Sunbeam Factory Floor, 1950

Kieran’s Comments on ‘Docklands Gateway Innovation Fund’, Cork City Council Meeting, 28 February 2011

Gateway Innovation Fund and Cork Docklands Project

 

Lord Mayor, every now and again, we check the pulse of docklands and see how it’s doing.

This is indeed an interesting report that reveals what we all knew in our hearts all along- that there is no money there to kick-start the real development of docklands.

But in addition, there was no real attempt by the last government to really engage with the future potential of such as a site and to harness its opportunities for Ireland’s long term future. Much of the analysis of its potential has really only being pushed by ourselves and outside agencies in the region.

The national potential of Cork Docklands, I feel, was never really appreciated at National level over the last number of years and the idea of actually creating proper gateway cities was never really pursued by the last government either.

And even the proposed policies of the general election candidates never really bit into the actual potential of Docklands for this region and the country at large.

I would like to commend yourself Lord Mayor for taking the various party leaders to task on their perspectives and question their commitment to Docklands.

I fear for the nature and form of the current plan. There were comments by general election candidates on how is the city going to attract the bones of 22,000 people to live in that area over the space of 20 years. I also share those concerns. The last time the population of the city itself jumped that high was during the creation of the local authority houses in places such as Ballyphehane and Churchfield in the 1950s and 1960s. To build momentum, to attract such a population demands a City that is reaching out not in its own region but reaching out deeply into other regions as well.

I have to say as well I heard during the debates and which I agree with – that the current docklands plan is just about apartments and mixed business units. I feel that the plan in Ireland’s current economic problems does nothing to bring Cork forward or even Ireland forward, economically, socially and culturally. If Docklands was given money for the bridge in the morning, we would end up with vast quantities of empty apartments and business units. Sure there would be a short term benefit in terms of construction jobs and so on, which would be very welcome. But we should question what we want the future of Cork and its Docklands to be.

Map of Cork Docklands Master Plan Overview

The current plan is still bound up with the mythic prosperity of the Celtic Tiger at its heights especially in the property bubble. It is still bound up with a kind of invisible money that we are hoping will appear in today’s world out of mid air like something in a magic show.

Economic momentum, which was there in 2007, has completely dissipated- we are learning now that much of it was based on borrowing money from international bondholders – there is also the issue of a principal developer in the docklands, who is now in NAMA. Certainly we now have a large jigsaw piece of docklands missing and even if found, the piece probably won’t fit into Cork’s economic landscape.

Plus there is the burning question what is going to happen to all these properties that have been NAMA’d.

There needs to be a hard and deep rethink about the docklands plan- the plan was conceived in an economic boom –the current plan has not reacted in any way to the downturn – we will continue to go to the new government saying we need money but we have not factored in the enormous changes in outlook of Ireland’s economic fortunes and the future needs of Irish society; the Cork docklands should feed into the new international outlook and the realistic strategies that Ireland needs to move forward in the longterm.

Docklands has certainly brought Cork to an international way of thinking; it is a very positive project; but economically the docklands as a space is not creative enough to be a sustainable place that connects into the city centre and moves with the rest of the city’s economic momentum.

I reckon that the docklands plan will have to be reconfigured in line with the economic realities of the next 15-20 years, which won’t I hope be bound up with another property bubble – the future of Ireland is going to be all about rebuilding and rebranding Ireland and implementing new ideas for jobs that are not all construction based. The young generation coming up will demand jobs that compliment their technological worlds. 

 I have no doubt that new plans will have to be considered for the Docklands Project. I welcome the move in the business community to consider a new university in the docklands with an Asian  connection. That is about thinking outside of the box.

View from Centre Park Road, September 2007

Cork Docklands Map

Kieran’s Motions and Question to the City Manager, Cork City Council Meeting, 28 February 2011

Kieran’s Motions and Question to the City Manager, Cork City Council Meeting, 28 February 2011

Motions:

In order to stress the importance of their work to their respective communities that they work in, that the Community Wardens give a report on their work to the housing functional committee (Cllr Kieran McCarthy)

 

That capital money be put aside for the roof of the local studies section of Cork City Library (Cllr Kieran McCarthy)

 

Question to the City Manager:

To ask the manager will he contact all general election candidates to cut and take away as well their plastic ties that held posters on poles in the city area?

 

Cork City Hall